The supreme court said they would take up the case.
It basically will finally give a determination of whether the 2nd amendment extends to state/local gov laws and not just federal laws like chicago is claiming it does. (i.e. the DC gun ban is a federal law cause DC isn't a state, so just cause the 2nd amendment prevailed on DC the decision didn't carry over to the other bans in the country).
It's gonna be like a year before they even have opening arguments though.
My guess on the decision is we will see the chicago gun ban go bye/bye. The pro-ban logic here is that the 2nd amendment ins't extended to the state/local level. Some of them actually aren't (5th amendment- indictment must be by grand jury). But the 1st amendment was extended to the state/local level on the premise that it is an individual right and fundemental to liberty.
So if you apply that to the 2nd amendment i think you can say bye-bye ban, cause the DC gun ban case already said it was an individual right and the amendment itself say "being necessary to the security of a free State". I guess we shall see.
.........................
Roo: "He doesn't like that."
Me: "Well he was smiling.....until he started screaming."